The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
Effects of Adjunctive Swedish Massage and Vibration Therapy on Short-Term Postoperative Outcomes: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Ann Gill Taylor, Daniel I. Galper, Peyton Taylor, Laurel W. Rice, Willie Andersen, William Irvin, Xin-Qun Wang, Frank E. Harrell. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. February 2003, 9(1): 77-89. doi:10.1089/107555303321222964.
Published in Volume: 9 Issue 1: July 5, 2004
Full Text: • PDF for printing (171.2 KB) • PDF w/ links (229.3 KB)
Objective: To examine the effects of adjunctive postoperative massage and vibration therapy on short-term postsurgical pain, negative affect, and physiologic stress reactivity.
Design: Prospective, randomized controlled trial. The treatment groups were: (1) usual postoperative care (UC); (2) UC plus massage therapy; or (3) UC plus vibration therapy.
Setting: The University of Virginia Hospital Surgical Units, Gynecology-Oncology Clinic, and General Clinical Research Center.
Subjects: One hundred and five (N = 105) women who underwent an abdominal laparotomy for removal of suspected cancerous lesions.
Interventions: All patients received UC with analgesic medication. Additionally, the massage group received standardized 45-minute sessions of gentle Swedish massage on the 3 consecutive evenings after surgery and the vibration group received 20-minute sessions of inaudible vibration therapy (physiotones) on the 3 consecutive evenings after surgery, as well as additional sessions as desired.
Outcome measures: Sensory pain, affective pain, anxiety, distress, analgesic use, systolic blood pressure, 24-hour urine free cortisol, number of postoperative complications, and days of hospitalization.
Results: On the day of surgery, massage was more effective than UC for affective (p = 0.0244) and sensory pain (p = 0.0428), and better than vibration for affective pain (p = 0.0015). On postoperative day 2, massage was more effective than UC for distress (p = 0.0085), and better than vibration for sensory pain (p = 0.0085). Vibration was also more effective than UC for sensory pain (p = 0.0090) and distress (p = .0090). However, after controlling for multiple comparisons and multiple outcomes, no significant differences were found.
http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/107555303321222964